Skip to main content

Restored Stanley Planes (Before & After)

 
Below will be many pictures of planes I've restored.

I will be the first to admit my skills as a restorer is limited.
I do what feel is right. What feels right for you will be different.
Many ways to skin a cat, mine were just a means to an end.


Stanley No.5 Type13 cleaned by a 1 hour dip in an electrolysis tank.

 
Generally, my restoration philosophy (huh?)is to bring the plane back in time, without doing any thing irreversible. Where possible, the factory finish is retained. This includes the original Japaning and the factory mill/grind marks. For this reason, I hardly use sandpaper, except to sand off flaking varnish from the wooden totes and knobs.

Type 13 "sweetheart" #5, before restoration.

Perhaps cleaning would be a better word.
 
 A 100 year-old plane has taken a beating, suffered the ravages of time. Rust, chipping, flaking, pitting, dents, scratches, insect bites, put away wet,forgotten, neglected, left in the barn to bake, left in the rain, left in a yard to rot, general neglect, sold, pawned, inherited, etc. For each ham-fisted new owner, it's another cycle of the above. To RESTORE would suggest bringing the plane to how it looked the day it left the factory. It would mean re-varnish, stripping and re-japaning, re-grinding, resurfacing, re-nickel plating, etc.
 
 It is always tempting to file back a chipped levercap, touch up missing pactchs of Japan with stove enamel, but these marks are part of the plane's history.
 
I think what I did should be called cleaning. But in any case, I aim to make them look like they were STILL being used, carefully sharpened and put away well oiled,
 
 Before: No. 3 type-11. If a tradesman were to depend on it to make a living, how would it look?
 
# 3 After: The brown rust stains can be cleaned off by gently scrubbing with fine metal polishing paste.
 
 
In fact, at this stage, I often debated with myself if this looks over-cleaned already.
 
And Block planes too....
picture sniped off ebay (seller's one picture-tells-all  of a post WWII stanley No.65)
 
 
 
This one still retains the factory milling marks.





I merely shined the knuckle with fine steel wool
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earlier type #220 (circa 1900s).For a plane pushing 110 years, the more I would want to preserve the looks 
(photo: ebay seller)
 
 
 
After cleaning: The lever cap screw was quite peeled over from careless screwdrivers, so I filed back the peening and reblued the steel; This deters further rusting. I don't think Stanley ever blued their screws. It is just my personal mark to distinguish a user plane from the shelf dwellers. It any case, it's better than a mirror finished screw head, and historically acceptable.
 
The Jappaning loss were left as it is, with the gentle removal of loose rust, especially on the cast raised wording, such that bare metal is exposed to suggest hand rubbing from frequent use. 


Another #5 type 11 before cleaning. (not to bad)


These "after" pictures will probably look more right, if I knew how to rotate a picture on this blog by 180 degrees.
 
I decided to tune this one to more to smooth than to hog, so I sharpened the iron dead straight across the cutting edge (without any camber ie. radius) I merely rounded the resulting sharp corners at each end to prevent the plane leaving marks. If you did everything right, the shaving should be (almost) full width. The seperated ribbons above is probably due to micro serrations at the cutting edge. A remedy would be to polish up the edge with a black arkansas or 6000 grit stone, followed by stropping on clean leather. I'm plain lazy, and I'll insist it has more to do with the species of wood (Nyatoh, Nato). Well, to be fair, I'll probably have a more gossamer like shave on cedar.

 
Many amateurs like to take photos of the shavings of the plane they just fettled.  After looking at the pictures above, I realised I'm just as lame. When will I ever show some of my work instead? At some point, we all have reminded ourselves to be more concerned with the surface a tool leave behind, rather than focusing on the tool and the debris it left behind.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SHARPENING WITH ARKANSAS STONES

What on earth are they? A user made box of assorted Arkansas stones. They are America's answer to: The Wales' Welsh Slate (Dragon's Tongue); The Scotch Tam O'Shanter; The English Charnley Forest stone; The Japanese Tenin Toishi; The German Thuringian Hone; The Chinese Guangzhou River bedrock; The Belgian Coticule; You get the idea. Local rocks that you use to sharpen mama's kitchen knives.   A collection of smaller pocket-sized Arkansas stones  In this entry, I will not try to tell you what you probably already know. What is the point of describing that oily rock you already have under your bench, in your drawer, in a can of kerosene? Note also, that the sharpening I describe here is best applied to woodworking in general. I am an amateur handtool woodworker. Sharpening a straight razor would be entirely another branch of science. I do not profess to know all there is to know about sharpening or Arkansas stones; I simply failed
26 comments
Read more

An Essential Pocket Knife : The Stockman

You're so right. I should be writing about Whittlers instead of Stockman knives. Afterall, this is a wood working blog. But do you whittle the whole day? Perhaps. Can you peel an apple with a whittler? Maybe, but not as well. What if you forgot the butter knife at a picnic, or you somehow need to spey or neuter an animal in an instant?.. (ok, I'm pulling your leg, but I'm referring to the ubiquitous spey blade in your stockman.) A stockman knife (Also called your Gandpa's EDC) will do all of the above with ease, and it will WHITTLE. My shallow pocket and minute brain says that Whittlers are for collectors. Try buying a Stag handled split-backsping whittler. They are not cheap. This is one of the forty stockmen I've purchased online. The other 39 are on their way. And yes, I have issues. The stockman bug maybe. Wait till my wife sees them: I like to imagine myself as a craftsman first, woodworker second. Now you see why I bought this brand. Looks so
13 comments
Read more

A Case for Chisels: Stanley 5000 series

“Life being very short, and the quiet hours of it few, we ought to waste none of them in reading valueless books.” -John Ruskin. Substitute the word "books" with "blogs", and perhaps you should stop reading. I did my part and you are warned. No, I can't refund 4 minutes of your life. F or the most part of my woodworking life, I've kept my loose chisels in felt lined drawers. (I mean excess chisels purchased on impulse: Those of cast steel, those of boxwood, those octagonal London snobs, those ergo grips that promises an orgasm with each mortise, the socketed, the tanged, the handle-less tangs, the long paring ones, those curious crank-necks, the basic pig stickers, the vintage ferrule-less-...you know. I know. Some folks have too many hammers or smoothing planes or trammels. I'm a chisel guy. But the ones that are constantly on the move live in a canvas tool roll. I like the look of a chisel roll, except that the edges tend to slice the
Post a Comment
Read more